The Work, Torah Teaching and Textual Standing of Shimon ben Sira
16 min read3,150 words
Summary
This work surveys the figure and teaching of Shimon ben Sira, a Jerusalem sage of the Second Temple period who created a synthesis between universal wisdom and the Torah of Moses while identifying the two completely. The text details his theological and social views, with emphasis on human free will and an earthly conception of reward that prefers a good name over the life of the World to Come. In addition, the article traces the history of the Hebrew text, which was lost and rediscovered in dramatic archaeological finds such as the Cairo Genizah and the Masada scroll, which prove the originality of the work. Finally, it explains the ambivalent attitude of the Sages towards the book, which ranges between an official prohibition of reading it within the canon and a wide adoption of "milei ma'aleyata" (excellent words) from it into the world of Midrash and Jewish liturgy.
Historical, Biographical and Genealogical Background
Shimon ben Yeshua ben Elazar ben Sira, known in scholarly literature and in Jewish tradition as Ben Sira or Jesus ben Sirach, was one of the greatest sages of Jerusalem in the Second Temple period [cite: 1, 2, 3]. His literary, intellectual and educational work is placed on the timeline between the end of the third century and the beginning of the second century BCE, with most scholars dating the writing of his principal work to around 180 BCE [cite: 2, 4]. Ben Sira lived and worked in Jerusalem in a period of profound political and cultural upheaval, which stemmed from the change of rule in the Land of Israel from the Egyptian house of Ptolemy to the Syrian house of Seleucus, and under the growing influence of Hellenistic culture on the aristocratic strata in Judea [cite: 1, 2]. In his book he is described as a scribe, a teacher of halakha and a composer of proverbs, who established a public beit midrash in Jerusalem and raised up many students, out of a desire to spread the wisdom of the Torah and to fortify the traditional religious identity of his contemporaries [cite: 1].
In the literature of the generations, and foremost in the book "Seder HaDorot", various and diverse traditions have been preserved regarding Ben Sira's family lineage [cite: 3]. One tradition identifies him as the son of Joshua the High Priest mentioned in the books of Ezra and Haggai, while other sources present him as a minister and a great man among the Jews [cite: 3, 5]. Alongside these traditions, a pseudepigraphic legend was widespread among medieval sages that attributes Ben Sira's birth to an extraordinary conception in a bathhouse involving the seed of the prophet Jeremiah, and hence the linguistic connection between the names Yirmeyah (Jeremiah) and Sira in gematria [cite: 3, 6, 7]. However, the greatest sages and scholars regarded these legends as folk tales not anchored in historical reality, and preferred to focus on the real figure of the Jerusalem sage as it emerges from his writings and from the findings of his own generation [cite: 6, 7].
Ben Sira was an eyewitness to the monumental works of the High Priest Shimon ben Yochanan, who is identified in scholarship and in the sources of the Sages as Shimon HaTzaddik (Simeon the Just) [cite: 1, 8]. His description of Shimon the High Priest in chapter 50 of the book reflects Ben Sira's immense admiration for the institution of the priesthood and records Shimon's building and fortification works in Jerusalem, such as digging the water reservoirs, strengthening the walls of the Temple and defending the city against siege, activities that fit the historical background of the restoration of the city after the conquest of Antiochus III [cite: 8, 9, 10].
His Torah Teaching and Theological Conceptions
Ben Sira's Torah teaching sets up a unique synthesis between biblical and universal wisdom literature and an uncompromising religious and halakhic commitment to the Torah of Moses [cite: 1, 2, 4]. The theological distinctiveness of the work lies in the complete identification it makes between cosmic "wisdom" and the historical "Torah" given to Israel [cite: 4, 11, 12]. Whereas in early biblical literature wisdom was perceived as a practical tool or as an abstract principle of creation, Ben Sira determines in chapter 24 that heavenly wisdom, which was created before the days of the world and sought a foothold among the nations, finally found its exclusive dwelling in Jerusalem as the book of the covenant of God Most High, which is the Torah of Moses [cite: 11, 12, 13]. This identification was intended to set a counterweight to general Hellenistic philosophy, while emphasising that the only way to attain supreme wisdom is through meticulous adherence to the commandments and laws of the Torah [cite: 1].
A further central layer in Ben Sira's teaching is the complex relationship between human free will and the justification of divine judgement [cite: 14]. In chapter 15 the author stresses that God created man from the beginning and left him in the hand of his inclination, with life and death, fire and water set before him, and he is free to stretch out his hand and choose good or evil [cite: 14]. This view utterly rejects the claim that God is the cause of man's sins [cite: 14]. Alongside freedom of choice, Ben Sira warns against excessive self-confidence in Heaven's mercy and in divine forgiveness [cite: 14]. He calls on a person not to delay his repentance and to return to the Lord without delay, lest God's wrath surprise him while he is still revelling in his sins [cite: 14]. The work stresses that alongside great mercy there also dwells God's anger, and the divine wrath ultimately rests upon the wicked [cite: 14].
Ben Sira's theological conception regarding reward and punishment remains faithful to the traditional biblical doctrine of retribution, which focuses entirely on this world [cite: 2]. There is no trace in his book of ideas of the resurrection of the dead, spiritual reward in the World to Come or the survival of the soul after death, views that began to take shape in that period in Pharisaic and apocalyptic circles [cite: 2]. Death is perceived as a fixed law of nature for all flesh, like the leaves of a tree that fall and make room for new leaves [cite: 14]. The true reward of the righteous is expressed in length of days, in health, in family tranquillity, and above all in leaving a good name and glory for future generations, a conception that matches the spirit of the Sadducean faction that grew out of the priestly aristocracy in Jerusalem [cite: 2, 6].
Evidence of the conservative literary structure of the work is Ben Sira's use of biblical literary patterns, such as numerical proverbs shaped in the form of warnings and practical guidance for the education of the soul [cite: 1, 15]. A prominent example of this is the typological structure of sayings beginning with ascending numbers, aimed at denouncing improper behaviour in high society, such as ministers who frequently visit banquet halls and disparage the honour of others [cite: 15].
The Social Order, Political Ethics and His Attitude to the Neighbouring Peoples
Ben Sira's moral thought is not confined to abstract theological reflection, but turns directly to practical guidance in social, economic and political life [cite: 1]. He devotes considerable space to analysing class relations in Jerusalem and warns against dangerous association with the rich and powerful [cite: 14, 16]. Through the parable of the pot and the pan, Ben Sira illustrates that a poor man's drawing close to a rich one is bound to end in utter breakage for the weaker [cite: 16]. He demands extreme caution in contact with rulers and men of authority, and likens walking in their courts to stepping among snares and over piercing thorns [cite: 14].
In parallel to his criticism of social gaps and of the moral corruption of the rich of Jerusalem, Ben Sira extols the values of charity and support for the needy [cite: 1, 16]. He calls on people to hold out a hand to the poor, to visit the sick, to mourn with those who weep and to show kindness also to the dead [cite: 16]. In family life he sets out a conservative patriarchal line, emphasising the father's duty to discipline his sons and educate them in the way of the Torah, together with the concern to marry off daughters while they are still young to wise and upright men in order to secure the future of the family line [cite: 1, 14].
A unique and highly significant component of Ben Sira's political-national teaching is his hostile and contemptuous attitude towards the neighbouring peoples surrounding Judea [cite: 10]. In chapter 50 he expresses deep hatred and loathing towards three specific ethnic and geographical groups, in a categorical formulation that attests to the political and religious tensions of his time [cite: 10]. This position reflects not only proud Judean patriotism, but also the bitter polemic conducted in those days against the Samaritans, who set up a cultic alternative to Mount Moriah on Mount Gerizim near Shechem [cite: 10].
The History of the Hebrew Text and the Archaeological Finds
The loss of the original Hebrew text of the Book of Ben Sira and its rediscovery in modern times constitute one of the most dramatic discoveries in the study of ancient Jewish literature [cite: 2, 17, 18]. Following the rejection of the book from the biblical canon, the Hebrew original disappeared almost entirely from the Jewish landscape, apart from a few quotations scattered in the literature of the Sages and in the works of Rav Saadia Gaon [cite: 2]. The Greek translation of the book, made by Ben Sira's grandson in 132 BCE, together with Latin and Syriac translations, served as the main channels through which the book was preserved in the Christian Church [cite: 2, 19]. The scholarly breakthrough came at the end of the 19th century with the discovery of the Hebrew text in the Cairo Genizah, and was confirmed definitively in the second half of the 20th century thanks to the archaeological finds in the Judean Desert and at Masada [cite: 2, 17, 18].
The discovery of the scroll at Masada on 8 April 1964 by the expedition of Yigael Yadin was a dramatic turning point [cite: 2, 20]. The scroll, found in one of the eastern rooms of the casemate wall at Masada, was written in parallel columns in which the hemistichs of the verses were arranged opposite one another, using special division marks for sections [cite: 2]. This find proved that the Hebrew text found in the Cairo Genizah is not a medieval retranslation, as several scholars had claimed, but a faithful copy of an original Hebrew text that was current in the Land of Israel at the end of the Second Temple period [cite: 2]. At Qumran, the inclusion of chapter 51 in the Psalms scroll 11Q5 highlights the blurred boundaries that existed at that time between the holy books and the external works, since the Qumran community read these passages as part of the psalms of King David himself [cite: 21].
The Standing of the Work in the Canon and in the Literature of the Sages
One of the most fascinating aspects of the study of the Book of Ben Sira is the duality that characterises the attitude of the sages of the Talmud and Midrash towards it [cite: 1, 6]. On the one hand, sharp rulings were laid down denying its sanctity and forbidding its public reading [cite: 1, 2, 6]. On the other hand, the Sages treated the book with immense respect, quoted from it extensively, and sometimes even presented its proverbs as verses from the third division of the Bible, the Writings [cite: 1, 6, 24].
The Question of Canonisation and the Grandson's Prologue
The historical evidence shows that the process by which the biblical canon took shape was long and complex, and took place mainly between the fifth century and the second century BCE [cite: 25]. The earliest document attesting to the threefold division of the canon ("the Law, the Prophets and the other books of the fathers") is the prologue of Ben Sira's grandson to the Greek translation of the book, written in Egypt around 130 BCE [cite: 11]. This testimony precedes by many years the reports of Philo of Alexandria and Josephus (Yosef ben Matityahu) regarding the number of the sacred books [cite: 11, 26]. The exclusion of the Book of Ben Sira from the canon stemmed mainly from the conception prevalent in Pharisaic circles that with the death of Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi the holy spirit departed from Israel, and therefore any work written after that period, Ben Sira among them, cannot be counted among the holy scriptures that render the hands impure [cite: 2, 11].
The Ambivalent Attitude in the Literature of the Sages and the Difference between the Talmuds
The Mishnah in tractate Sanhedrin brings the famous ruling of Rabbi Akiva that "one who reads in the external books has no share in the World to Come", and the Talmud clarifies that this prohibition includes the books of Ben Sira and Ben La'ana [cite: 2, 6, 27]. However, an examination of the disagreement between the Jerusalem Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud reveals fundamental differences in the geographical and religious background in which the sages worked [cite: 2]. In the Land of Israel, the home of the Yerushalmi, the sages had to contend with sharp polemics against early Christianity [cite: 2]. The Christians claimed that prophecy had never ceased, and sought to add the external books to the biblical canon in order to lend legitimacy to the New Testament [cite: 2, 25]. Therefore the Yerushalmi decreed an absolute and sweeping prohibition on reading the book in order to prevent a blurring of the boundaries of faith [cite: 2].
In Babylonia, by contrast, far from the centres of friction with the Christian communities, there was no well-founded fear that reading Ben Sira would lead to heresy [cite: 2]. Accordingly, the Bavli presents a far more pragmatic and moderate approach [cite: 2]. In tractate Sanhedrin (100b) it is related that the Amora Rav Yosef sought to forbid reading Ben Sira because of sayings defined as "divrei havai" (frivolous talk of little value and words of nonsense) that cause neglect of Torah study [cite: 2, 27, 28]. Abaye challenged him and showed that the supposedly problematic sayings can be given a logical explanation that does not contradict the spirit of the Torah [cite: 2, 28]. Following the discussion, Rav Yosef moderated his ruling and determined that it is permitted to read and expound in public the excellent things in the book [cite: 1, 2, 6, 27].
The Talmud presents a detailed analysis of those sayings that distinguishes between the unfit parts and the worthy ones, as set out in the following table:
In addition, special importance attaches to the quotation in Bava Kamma 92b: "Every bird dwells with its own kind, and man with one like himself" [cite: 1, 6, 24]. The Gemara attributes this verse to the part "stated a third time in the Writings", which indicates that in certain generations of the Amoraim the Book of Ben Sira was perceived as having a sacred standing almost equivalent to the books of the Bible, to the point that it was confused with the official books of the Writings [cite: 1, 6, 31]. The liturgical influence of the book is also expressed in the concluding formulas of blessings and in the Yom Kippur liturgical poems describing the beauty of the High Priest as he came out of the Holy of Holies [cite: 1, 6].
Summary and Conclusions
The work and Torah teaching of Shimon ben Sira represent one of the most important and influential creations of the Second Temple period. The work attests to a sophisticated intellectual attempt to defend original Judaism against the harms of Hellenisation, using modern literary and philosophical tools and through a bold identification of cosmic wisdom with the Torah of Moses [cite: 4, 11, 12]. Despite the book's official rejection from the biblical canon because of questions concerning the period of its writing and the spirit of prophecy, its proverbs, ideas and descriptions seeped into the heart of the literature of the Sages and deeply influenced the shaping of Jewish liturgy and thought throughout the generations [cite: 1, 2, 6].
The archaeological finds at Masada and Qumran, together with the discovery of the Genizah fragments in Cairo, have definitively confirmed the existence of the Hebrew original and the centrality of the book in the religious life of the Jews at the end of the Second Temple period [cite: 2, 18, 20]. Understanding the dynamic between the canonical rejection and the practical adoption of "milei ma'aleyata" from Ben Sira sheds new light on the ways in which the Oral Torah was shaped and on the intellectual flexibility of the sages of the Talmud in preserving pearls of wisdom from the external literature for the education and spiritual welfare of the public [cite: 1, 2, 6].
Sources31
- 1.אנציקלופדיה יהודית דעת - בן סירא ;, daat.ac.il/encyclopedia/value.asp?id1=1464
- 2.בן סירא - ויקיפדיה, he.wikipedia.org/wiki/בן_סירא
- 3.Seder HaDorot, Tanaim and Amoraim 2799 | Sefaria Library, sefaria.org/Seder_HaDorot,_Tanaim_and_Amoraim.2799
- 4.בן סירא | Sefaria Library - ספריא, sefaria.org.il/Ben_Sira
- 5.סדר הדורות, סדר ימות עולם ג׳תמ״ח | האוסף של ספריא, sefaria.org.il/Seder_HaDorot,_Almanac.3448
- 6.בן סירא (סיכום שיעור) - אתר הרב אורי שרקי, ravsherki.org/index.php/2013-02-13-17-15-16/156-q-156/412-2016-11-22-20-16-03/6868-2018-05-25-13-11-06
- 7.בן סירא (סיכום שיעור) - אתר הרב אורי שרקי, ravsherki.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6868:2018-05-25-13-11-06&catid=412
- 8.שמעון הצדיק - ויקיפדיה, he.wikipedia.org/wiki/שמעון_הצדיק
- 9.על מפעלו של שמעון הצדיק בהר הבית - עיון במקורות, הצעת שרידים והצגה גרפית, cris.huji.ac.il/en/publications/על-מפעלו-של-שמעון-הצדיק-בהר-הבית-עיון-במקורות-הצעת-שרידים-והצגה-ג/
- 10.בן סירא נ - ויקיטקסט, he.wikisource.org/wiki/בן_סירא_נ
- 11.איך הוחלט אלו ספרים יכללו בקאנון התנ"ך והברית החדשה? - igod.co.il, igod.co.il/reliability-scriptures/איך-הוחלט-אלו-ספרים-יכללו-בתנך-ובברית/
- 12.שלחן-ערוך-המדות-ד-אמונה.pdf - משיב כהלכה, meshiv.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/שלחן-ערוך-המדות-ד-אמונה.pdf
- 13.בן סירא א - ויקיטקסט, he.wikisource.org/wiki/בן_סירא_א
- 14.גֹּדֵר פֶּרֶץ | ספר בן סירא - חלק א׳ - גודר פרץ, goder-peretz.com/ספר-בן-סירא-חלק-א
- 15.בן סירא כא - ויקיטקסט, he.wikisource.org/wiki/בן_סירא_כא
- 16.בן סירא (מהדורת דוד כהנא) - ויקיטקסט, he.wikisource.org/wiki/בן_סירא_(מהדורת_דוד_כהנא)
- 17.גניזה - וגניזת קהיר | לקסיקון לתרבות ישראל - תרבות.il, tarbutil.cet.ac.il/lexicon/גניזה/
- 18.גניזת קהיר - ויקיפדיה, he.wikipedia.org/wiki/גניזת_קהיר
- 19.בן סירא - ויקיטקסט, he.wikisource.org/wiki/בן_סירא
- 20.מגילת בן-סירא ממצדה | יגאל ידין - משכיל • חנות ספרים משומשים, lamaskill.com/product/מגילת-בן-סירא-ממצדה/
- 21.מגילת התהילים הגדולה - ויקיפדיה, he.wikipedia.org/wiki/מגילת_התהילים_הגדולה
- 22.Start Here | התחילו כאן - Dicta Genizah Search, genizahsearch.com/start
- 23.About the Cairo Genizah | על גניזת קהיר, genizahsearch.com/about
- 24.בבא קמא צב: - BeitChabad.com - בית חב"ד, he.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/5455064
- 25.קאנוניזציה של כתבים - ויקיפדיה, he.wikipedia.org/wiki/קאנוניזציה_של_כתבים
- 26.התנ"ך - המהדורה הראשונה - יְקוּם תַּרְבּוּת - יקום תרבות, yekum.org/2019/12/התנך-המהדורה-הראשונה/
- 27.פסוקים מספר בן סירא - נתיבות הש"ס, netivothashas.org.il/SubjectTitle/פסוקים-מספר-בן-סירא
- 28.פירוש חברותא - פורטל הדף היומי, daf-yomi.com/Dafyomi_Page.aspx?id=3809&vt=7
- 29.מילי מעלייתא דרב יוסף – תלמוד בבלי: סנהדרין ק ע״ב, ט–יב | שטייגן, app.shtaygen.ai/gold/SAN_A04_O01_S32_M01
- 30.ביאור שטיינזלץ על סנהדרין ק׳ ב:ב | האוסף של ספריא, sefaria.org.il/Steinsaltz_on_Sanhedrin.100b.2
- 31.HebrewBooks.org -בבלי - מסכת בבא קמא דף צב עמוד ב, hebrewbooks.org/shas.aspx?mesechta=21&daf=92b&format=text